Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Mass Rally Planned "For The Love of Egypt"



From: Al-Masry Al-Youm

On Sunday, 30 parties and political movements announced that they will participate in the rally planned for next Friday in Cairo's Tahrir Square. The rally is called "Together for the love of Egypt."

A joint statement issued by the groups said the purpose of the rally is to call for a civil state, whereby all religious creeds are respected and all Egyptians are equal.

Hamada al-Kashef, a member of the Revolution Youth Union, said the rally is not a response to the mass rally staged by Islamists two weeks ago.

Among those who will participate are the National Association for Change, the April 6 Youth Movement, the Egyptian Communist Party, the Revolution Youth Union, Sufis, the Adl Party, the Egyptian Democratic Party and several Coptic coalitions.

Participants said they reject any attempts at dragging religion into politics or play on the Egyptians’ emotions.

The statement said the rally will be like a national carnival, opening with the largest collective iftar in the Middle East under the title "For the love of Egypt, together we break the fast and pray.” The banquet will extend from Abdel Moneim Riyad Square to Qasr al-Aini Street. Islamic and Coptic religious songs will be sung afterwards.

The statement said the objective is to call for completing the Egyptian revolution, which defended freedom, social justice and human rights.

It also called for a passing a law to criminalize discrimination, defending the rule of law, and drafting a constitution that safeguards the civil state.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Joy At Same Sex Marriage Victory


By Shelley Ettinger
Published Jun 29, 2011 4:45 PM


A massive crowd, estimated at 2 million people by Heritage of Pride officials, thronged the streets of Manhattan June 26 for the Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Queer Pride parade. Jubilation reigned.

Just over 36 hours before marchers stepped off at 12 noon, same-sex marriage was legalized in the state of New York.

People had been celebrating since the bill passed Friday night. Now, on Sunday, the thrill of victory electrified the crowds at the annual march marking the 42nd anniversary of the Stonewall Rebellion.

Workers World joins the celebration. We salute the fighters whose struggle won this advance toward equality. And we demand full equality now: federal recognition of same-sex marriage rights, along with, finally, a federal civil rights law banning all discrimination against LGBTQ people.

It’s appropriate that this win coincided with Pride weekend — because it is indeed the mass struggle for four-plus decades that won marriage rights in New York. The LGBTQ movement, which started with that great rebellion against the police at the Stonewall Inn 42 years ago, has mobilized, protested, marched, sat in, stood up time and time again since then.

This mass action against oppression has achieved something remarkable. It has changed consciousness. So now, in a breathtaking shift that couldn’t have been predicted even a few short years ago, every public opinion poll shows that the majority of people in this country believe same-sex couples should have the right to marry.

This doesn’t mean inequality, discrimination and violence have been vanquished, especially not for LGBTQ people of color, trans people and youth. It doesn’t mean that the forces of reaction are ready to surrender. There is much more struggle ahead, and there will be setbacks along with victories.

But mass support for LGBTQ rights is a fact, creating popular pressure for change. It’s this pressure that drove the state of New York to legalize same-sex marriage.

Don’t thank Cuomo


No credit is due to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. No one should hail him as the hero of this story. Cuomo is a vicious union-busting, anti-worker, anti-poor, program-cutting reactionary. The way he maneuvered himself into position as the great man who handed the LGBTQ community this law is the most brazen display of demagoguery by any politician in a long time.

Cuomo signed the law right after forcing the state employee unions to accept a raft of terrible givebacks. He’s just cut budgets and raised tuition at the State University of New York and City University of New York, closing off access to the state and city university systems for many working-class students, especially immigrants and people of color. He is gutting social programs right and left, pushing the kind of racist assault against the working class and oppressed of New York that not even the last Republican governor could get away with. All this hurts LGBTQ people, who after all are, like most people, part of the working class.

Yet, lo and behold, he portrays himself as the great liberator. He is not. Cuomo may have signed the law. He may have carried out the parliamentary maneuvers necessary to get it passed — and, by the way, agreed to an outrageous series of exceptions permitting all manner of religious and quasi-religious entities to continue discriminating against same-sex couples. And he may even have wooed moneybags donors to fund the final lobbying efforts. None of this was decisive.

The struggle was decisive.

With each blow against inequality, the working class as a whole is strengthened. Now, in New York, there is one less tool with which the boss class can try to divide the workers and oppressed, one less artificial wedge blocking unity.

A matter of equal rights

The institution of heterosexual marriage is rooted in class society and based on the subjugation of women. Its original purpose was to codify paternity, ensure patrilineal inheritance and enforce male ownership of women. Marriage has traditionally functioned as part of women’s oppression.

But modern marriage is also a compendium of more than 1,000 legal rights and privileges. Same-sex couples are denied access to these rights and privileges. This is sheer discrimination. Thus, the fight to win marriage equality is a basic civil-rights issue. For this reason, and because it is part of the overall class struggle, every socialist should support this fight and applaud each gain along the way.

At the same time it should be understood that in New York and every state where marriage equality is won, the gain is largely symbolic. Symbolism certainly matters; just ask the joyous couples who were celebrating at Pride. Every battle, in every city and state, matters — especially the current court battle to throw out Proposition 8, which bars same-sex marriage in California.

But more than 35 states currently ban same-sex marriage. Nationally, the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996, bars any rights for same-sex couples even if they are legally married. All this must be overturned on the federal level.

It will take continued struggle to win change nationally. Most national politicians, from the White House to the Congress, remain unwilling to take a stand for full rights. At a June 23 LGBT Democratic Party fundraiser in New York City, President Barack Obama offered vague generalities about his ostensible support for LGBT rights but refused to endorse marriage equality.

Fight on!

A state-by-state strategy cannot win full rights. This is a national fight, and ultimately it’s a national movement that will win all rights on the federal level.

There are important lessons to be drawn from the African-American Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s. There were struggles in many locations, each vitally important — but it was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was the decisive victory.

As for marriage, at a time when many states still barred so-called miscegenation — marriage between Black and white people — it was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1967 Loving vs. Virginia ruling that struck down those racist laws once and for all. In a June 2007 statement marking the 40th anniversary of that decision, Mildred Loving herself came out in support of same-sex marriage, a year before she died.

Now, as we pause to savor the sweetness of winning same-sex marriage in New York and congratulate all who choose to claim this new right, let’s also look forward to the next stage in the struggle. Let’s fight on to win full federal rights for LGBTQ people.

Monday, May 2, 2011

May Day in Moscow Includes Countless Competing Rallies



Not just unions and communists in Moscow this year for May 1st. The Russian LGBT movement marched, as did the Russian Fascists.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Zionists Protest Gay Pride Because "Nazis Were Gay"



Jewish Defense League likens gays to Nazis

From:Xtra Online


The Jewish Defense League (JDL) is attempting to organize an April 15 protest at the offices of Pride Toronto (PT). “During the Nazi era, many high-ranking Nazis were gay,” the JDL Facebook invitation reads in part.
JDL spokesperson Meir Weinstein, as seen at the QuAIA contingent staging area for the 2010 Toronto Pride parade.
(Xtra files)

That statement is “inane, meaningless and nonsense,” says Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Bernie Farber. “Is the JDL trying to suggest that gays and lesbians are Nazis?”

Farber says that he resents the frequent misuse and abuse of “Nazi analogies” and that he is “calling the JDL out on its stupidity.”

“They shouldn’t be protesting Pride Toronto, anyway,” says Farber. “They should be protesting QuAIA.”

“We are taking the gay community that runs this parade to task,” says Meir Weinstein, national director of the JDL’s Canadian branch. “We are speaking out against this vile, anti-Jewish, anti-Israel group.”

Farber says the “temperature needs to be toned down” in this debate. “By throwing out ridiculous epithets, we will not accomplish what we need to accomplish, which is to disallow hateful statements in the Pride parade. This kind of statement turns people off.”

PT co-chair Francisco Alvarez says he supports the JDL’s right to free speech, “just as we support everyone’s right to free speech.”

On April 10 a group staged a protest outside the Bathurst and Lawrence TD Bank branch says Scott Mullin, vice-president of government and community relations at TD Bank Financial Group.

Mullin says about 35 people attended the demonstration. Their message was that TD Bank, PT’s main corporate financial backer, should discontinue its support of the festival.

“The people protesting were concerned about our sponsorship of Pride,” Mullin says.

“We have no plans currently [to pull out of sponsorship], but obviously there is a very strong debate going on surrounding the Pride parade and who gets to participate. So we’ve had people express their views in a variety of ways, some write letters. A demonstration like on Sunday doesn’t happen very often.”

Mullen says he supports PT as it implements the Community Advisory Panel (CAP) report.

“A lot of consultation went into that report,” he says. “I trust the dispute-resolution process. I’m hopeful that it will lead to some quiet around this issue, and we can get back to focusing on what Pride is supposed to be about, which is a celebration of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community.”

Friday, March 25, 2011

Women & The Right to Education

By LeiLani Dowell
Published Mar 23, 2011 9:52 PM


Taken from a talk to a Workers World Party International Working Women’s Month forum in New York City. Dowell is a Fight Imperialism, Stand Together organizer and WW managing editor. Listen to entire talk at www.workers.tv.


At Hunter College women make up 70 percent of the student body — a trend that is being reproduced throughout the country, with more and more women attending college. This makes any struggle for education a women’s issue. Almost half of the women attending my school — 48 percent — are women of color.

And yet in the halls of my school today, posters created and posted by students in women and gender studies classes at Hunter are demanding a Women and Gender Studies Department.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo — who campaigned on a promise to bust up the unions — is now trying to cut funding to the City University of New York system, of which Hunter is a part, by $95 million, as well as the State University of New York by $100 million and community colleges by $62 million. The schools will respond by raising tuition and fees for students, making it harder and harder for poor, working-class folks to attend.

Free tuition at CUNY was a reality during some of your lifetimes. I can’t imagine going to college for free now.

In North Rhine-Westphalia, the most populous and economically most powerful state in Germany with more than 25 percent of Germany’s student population, the regional parliament just abolished tuition fees. An activist in this struggle stressed that “only huge waves of protests over a long period of time could take us to this kind of rollback.”

A series on public education has been running in Workers World newspaper written by retired teacher Gene Clancy. He discusses what public education meant to the capitalists in the beginning of the 20th century: a means to train the next generation of workers. A century later with the onset of imperialist globalization, the capitalists no longer have a need to train skilled workers. Moreover, they’ve found they can profit from it, rather than giving it away for free. That’s what the charter school movement is all about.

School remains a place where students are trained in the ideology of capitalism. It’s where we’re taught that capitalism is the best system, the only sustainable, logical system. That’s a bunch of lies, essentially. Therefore, it’s so very important that we engage with students, that we provide an alternative to the propaganda they’re force-fed in the classrooms.

Students interacting with and showing solidarity with workers is a momentous step forward. The fact that an alliance of students, community and labor has been formed can be decisive in turning back austerity budgets, but also in fighting, in general, against sexism, against war, against racism and anti-lesbian/gay/bi/trans/queer bigotry, against the system itself. Being involved in the battle against austerity in alliances will sharpen all these forces politically.

We’ve recently seen the effects of the student movement on a global level. The student movement was the first sector to rise up in response to the attacks on the public sector, both here in the U.S. and in Ireland, Britain, Italy, Pakistan, France, Greece and Puerto Rico. Students continue to play important roles in the anti-imperialist revolts sweeping the Middle East. And of course there’s the role of students in Wisconsin — another beautiful instance of unity among students, labor and the community. At Hunter students recently waged a successful campaign to save childcare there.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Rape, Racism, and the Media



By Shelley Ettinger
Published Mar 17, 2011 9:16 PM

This article is based on a Read Red blog at http://tinyurl.com/4dvz7ap.


The New York Times ran an appalling March 9 story about a gang rape in east Texas that left me sickened and shaken. The victim was an 11-year-old girl. There were, reportedly, 18 rapists. Eighteen! They included some star high-school athletes as well as some sons of locally prominent families. At least one of them videotaped the assault with his cell phone. The video was shown around by the bragging rapists, and that’s how the crime eventually came to light and they were brought to justice.

These facts weren’t the only appalling thing about the Times piece. The story itself descended into the worst despicably sexist terms in its characterization of the child who was so terribly brutalized and defiled. The newspaper found it necessary to comment that she was known in the neighborhood for wearing inappropriately mature clothes and makeup and for hanging out in the wrong places. Yes, that’s right — the report implies that this 11-year-old child was a slut; she was asking for it; she deserved to be destroyed. This aspect of the report was picked up quickly by a number of commentators, who have denounced the Times for its disgusting blame-the-victim insinuations.

But there’s another aspect. After my first read and my first reaction, which was rage and horror, I cooled down a little and started to think, started wondering. I referred above to “facts” — but I know better than to rely on the bourgeois press for the truth. I used the phrase “brought to justice” — but I know there is no justice under capitalism, and especially not in rape cases, not for the victims of sex assault, nor for the young men who might be arrested and charged whether they did it or not. Yes, I’m talking about race: What I started wondering most of all was just who these 18 alleged rapists were. So I did a quick search and found some other, earlier, local articles about this case.

Almost immediately, a series of mug shots appeared on my screen of young African-American men. The victim’s picture of course isn’t available, but I guessed that she too is Black because if she were white we’d have heard much more about this case much sooner; quite possibly we’d have heard about a lynching. Later reports say that the victim is Latina. As it is, knowing that all the alleged rapists are Black makes this a story not only about what we Marxists call the woman question, but also about the national question.

Now reread this from the Times piece: “The video led the police to an abandoned trailer, more evidence, and, eventually, to a roundup over the last month of 18 young men and teenage boys.” A roundup of African-American youths.

The rape of this child was a heinous crime. It’s almost impossible for me to believe that this roundup by the Cleveland, Texas, police, a force made up overwhelmingly of white men, is not another crime — a racist crime. That is, that some of those arrested are innocent, picked up for the crime of being young Black men. And that they’ll be railroaded into prison where they’ll join so many other young Black men locked up for the crime of being poor and oppressed. So now there will be two crimes: that against the child and that against those who had nothing to do with it, but were rounded up.

This is not the Glen Ridge rape. That case was beautifully analyzed in the 1997 book “Our Guys” by Bernard Lefkowitz. In 1989 in Glen Ridge, an affluent white New Jersey suburb, a bunch of star athletes gang-raped a mentally challenged girl — and almost the whole community united to defend and protect them. The victim and her family were made pariahs. The rapists were treated as heroes or, at worst, good guys who made a minor mistake. Not one of them ever served serious time.

Here, in contrast, we have cops rounding up Black youths. If there have been confessions, we have the likelihood that they were coerced. That some of them might be false confessions. That some of those rounded up didn’t do it. This is the United States. There is no way that justice will be done. (Nor do I think that any trials, convictions and imprisonments of those who actually did commit the rape will constitute justice, for none of that will address or redress any of what’s wrong with this society, any of the real causes of these crimes.)

Don’t get me wrong. I remain enraged and shaken about the unspeakable crime that was committed. I can’t stop thinking about the 11-year-old girl and how she’ll manage to survive on into adulthood — if she’ll manage to survive. Both the brutal misogyny of the crime and the sexist reporting of it make me want to scream and shout. But I won’t join the rush to judgment against those accused. Because when Black men are accused of rape, especially in a case like this when so many are accused at once, and in small-town Texas [with a sordid history including the KKK and police brutality — WW] no less, you can be assured that racism too is involved. There is a long history of Black men being made into poster images for rape, whether the victim is Black or white, and of rape charges being used to justify racist violence and scapegoating. This goes back to slavery times and then the Klan and Jim Crow in the terrible lynch-law era. Then there was the Scottsboro case back in the 1930s. And more recently, the case of the Central Park jogger, for which the New York Police Department rounded up a bunch of Black youths who were demonized and caricatured as, basically, animals who had carried out what the media called a “wilding” — and who, despite their protestations of innocence were tried, convicted and imprisoned only to be exonerated years later after losing most of their youth to prison.

I recently read Jeffrey B. Perry’s excellent book on Hubert Harrison, the first of a projected two-part biography of this great Black radical of early 20th-century Harlem. In the book Perry repeatedly returns to the lodestar of Harrison’s political life: the principle (and practical necessity) that fighting racism must be paramount; that as long as white supremacy reigns, there can be no class unity. A socialist revolutionary must always remember this. The Cleveland, Texas, rape case is the latest reminder.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Domestic Partner Benefits Approved While Public Sector Unions Face Givebacks

By Martha Grevatt
Published Mar 13, 2011 10:06 PM


In 2004, as part of a right-wing appeal to bigotry designed to get President George W. Bush re-elected, voters were bombarded with rhetoric against same-sex marriage. Michigan, Ohio and other states passed mini-DOMAs — modeling the federal “Defense of Marriage Act” in defining marriage as a union of “one man and one woman.”

It was outrageous enough to amend state constitutions to deny such a basic civil right to the lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender/queer communities, but six years later the right wing continues to push for the broadest possible interpretation. Same-sex and unmarried opposite-sex couples are being denied a whole host of rights that might otherwise be afforded to “domestic partners.”

Everything from equal access to campus housing to protection for victims of domestic violence has come under the scrutiny of groups such as the American Family Association. In Michigan, they cite the actual language of the state’s “Marriage Protection Amendment,” which states, “The union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.” (legislature.mi.gov)

During the 2004 campaign the AFA argued that voters didn’t have to worry about anyone losing health benefits because the MPA was a “marriage only” amendment. They made an about-face after they won its passage, however, using the words “for any purpose” in an amicus brief supporting the governor, Democrat Jennifer Granholm, against the Michigan chapter of Pride at Work.

The ACLU had filed a lawsuit in 2005 on behalf of Pride at Work, seeking a declaratory ruling that the MPA does not prohibit public employers from providing health benefits to same-sex domestic partners. These benefits had been negotiated for state government and university employees by their unions the year before.

The case proceeded through the state courts, some ruling in favor of LGBTQ workers and some against, until in 2008 the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the “for any purpose” wording meant that providing equal benefits violated the 2004 amendment. The ruling was a serious setback for the LGBTQ community.

Now the Michigan Civil Service Commission has not only restored but expanded those benefits with a 3-1 decision allowing coverage for one “other eligible adult” (OEA) — any adult, other than tenants or live-in aids, living with the worker for more than a year and who intends to continue living with the worker. Dependents of the OEA are also covered. Some communities and universities had already been providing OEA or “household member” coverage; they changed the language from “domestic partner” in anticipation of the 2008 ruling.

The right wing is fuming over having to cover even more uninsured people. They have to acknowledge that what they consider a subverting of the MPA is perfectly constitutional — in fact, they are using it to argue in other states that passing more mini-DOMAs won’t cost anyone their health care. At present 27 states have passed anti-marriage amendments, but a growing number of states allow or recognize same-sex marriages or civil unions.

In Ohio — where the Supreme Court ruled that providing domestic partner benefits did not violate the state’s anti-marriage amendment — anti-union and anti-LGBTQ lawmakers have sneaked into a Wisconsin-style budget-cutting bill, SB5, a line defining marriage as being between “one man and one woman.” To insert this into a bill in a state where same-sex marriage is already illegal can mean only one thing. “This bill will eliminate all domestic partnership benefits, straight or gay, besides attacking unions,” stated Mark Szabo, who organized a demonstration in Cleveland against the sneaky bigots. “Basically we are trying to protect what small rights we have.”

In Michigan, the latest tactic by the right wing is to make an issue of the cost of providing OEA benefits. The new governor, Republican Rick Snyder, said that while the current OEA language is clearly legal, he is “frustrated and disappointed” about having to provide health care to uninsured adults at a possible cost of almost $6 million. That amount is roughly three-thousandths of 1 percent of the state deficit! Some right-wing pundits are calling for the abolition of the Civil Service Commission, established in 1908 by constitutional amendment to administer the providing of civil and human services.

By ranting against the negligible cost, Snyder is consciously attempting to pit union workers — whose wages, pensions, and benefits are in danger — against the LGBTQ community. Snyder despises both.

Unfortunately, the Michigan State Employees Association, citing the 3 percent pay cut taken by its members, bought into the propaganda and stated its opposition to “extra benefits.” More importantly, though, the two major unions for state workers — the Service Employees union and United Auto Workers Local 6000 — support equal benefits.

Responding to the latest threat by the Republican-dominated state Legislature to overturn the commission’s directive, Local 6000 legislative liaison Ray Holman stated, “This was negotiated. ... It’s not really appropriate for the legislature to try to overturn the civil service commission.” (Between the Lines, March 3)

Tens of thousands of union workers have been protesting Snyder’s union-busting “budget repair” plan. They must not let themselves get sidetracked by scapegoating or bigotry, but should stand with all workers and oppressed communities,which are in the crosshairs of the ruling class.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

The Fight to Protect LGBTQ Youth

By Martha Grevatt
Detroit
Published Feb 21, 2011 6:25 PM


In Michigan there is currently a struggle over whether or not to pass “anti-bullying” legislation. To define its opponents as “bigoted extremists” would be an understatement. Who could possibly stand in the way of protecting a child from assault, harassment and intimidation?

Michigan is one of only five states that do not have some sort of legislation that mandates local school districts to adopt a model anti-bullying policy. Physical violence, harassment, intimidation, and verbal, written and graphic gestures — including those that are electronically transmitted — fall under the umbrella of bullying. While the word “bullying” is itself a euphemism for the violent and hate-motivated terror that has led to a spate of widely publicized youth suicides, the push for anti-bullying legislation has spawned a progressive movement uniting the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer communities with teachers and their unions and parent survivors of “bullycide.”

Named for Matt Epling, who took his life at the age of 14 after being repeatedly tortured by his classmates, “Matt’s Law” has been introduced and reintroduced in the Michigan Legislature over the past 10 years. A version passed by the House in 2006 defined bullying as abuse “that is reasonably perceived as being motivated either by any actual or perceived characteristic, such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression; or a mental, physical, or sensory disability or impairment; or by any other distinguishing characteristic.” Under the Model Policy, school boards must institute “appropriate remedial actions for a student or staff member who commits one or more acts of harassment or bullying [which] may range from positive behavioral interventions up to and including suspension or expulsion, in the case of a student, or suspension or termination in the case of an employee.” (www.michigan.gov)

The Republican-dominated state Senate has repeatedly blocked passage. The bill’s most vocal opponent has been Gary Glenn of the American Family Association’s state chapter, who objects to protecting LGBTQ youth. “Public school officials have a legal duty not to put children at risk by in any way legitimizing or encouraging homosexual behavior,” this bigot stated in 2007, “a practice scientifically proven to result in a dramatically higher incidence of domestic violence, mental illness, illegal drug use, promiscuity, life-threatening disease, and premature death.” (Michigan Messenger)

The LGBTQ movement is split over whether to support a compromise bill eliminating “enumeration” of the various well-documented hate motives, referring instead to acts “motivated by animus or by an actual perceived characteristic.” Some activists believe that the substitute language would still give targeted youth a measure of protection; others demand enumeration, citing studies showing that harassment and physical abuse of LGBTQ students are less frequent when their oppression is spelled out. Hundreds representing both viewpoints came out for a Jan. 26 public hearing sponsored by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, joining in outrage at the failure to pass any kind of legislation protecting youth not only from anti-LGBTQ bigotry, but also from racist, sexist and anti-disability bigotry.

Glenn remains opposed even to the tame version of Matt’s Law. In 2009 he argued that “ ‘characteristics’ language does not define bullying. It defines one of innumerable motivations for bullying. Of all possible motivations for bullying, what makes that one so special that it’s the only one cited by the legislation?” He favors a version that merely defines bullying as “bad.” (Michigan Messenger, March 2, 2009)

Some conservative bigots have taken an even more extreme position, opposing any anti-bullying legislation. In Minnesota, where progressive voices are calling for the strengthening of that state’s weak law, unsuccessful Republican candidate for governor Tom Emmer stated last year that “it’s up to the parents ... how they handle that situation. ... I don’t want the government doing that for us.” (Minnesota Independent, Sept. 8) Others are parroting the old racist “states rights” line, using Michigan’s “home rule” law to encourage local communities to oppose state mandates designed to protect youth.

Safe schools are a right!

According to The Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network’s 2009 School Climate Survey, 84.6 percent of LGBTQ students had been verbally harassed, 40.1 percent physically harassed, and 18.8 percent physically assaulted; LGBTQ youth were reportedly bullied at a rate four times that of non-LGBTQ youth. They had the second-highest rate of reported abuse overall. Frequent attacks also occur against youth of color, girls, immigrants, religious minorities and disabled youth. A majority of youth overall experienced some kind of so-called bullying; the number one bullying motive cited was “appearance.”

Emboldened by Tea Party advances, the religious right is willing to shove young people into the lion’s den for the crime of being different.

The torment all these precious children and youth face under a patriarchal and racist, capitalistic system — where those deemed “beautiful” are exploited to sell products and those deemed “ugly” are ridiculed for profit by the entertainment industry — is criminal. These brutal statistics are another reason to fight for a world where no child will go to school in fear or commit “bullycide” to escape a life of ridicule and terror.

E-mail: mgrevatt@workers.org

Sunday, February 6, 2011

The "Wonder Years" of the 1950s, A Rotten Capitalist Lie!

by Caleb T. Maupin

Imagine going to your local public library and asking for a book by Karl Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, or maybe a book of sociology dealing with homosexuality or feminism. Imagine then being told by the librarian that these books were locked in a cabinet, and before getting them out, you had to present your I.D. so the librarian could then write down your name and present it to the FBI at the end of the day.

Does this sound like Freedom? Does this sound like “the great years of the Republic” or “Morning in America?” But this was typical in the 1950s United States.

Contrary to the mythology that has been constructed, the 1950s, so idealized by the right-wing and to some extent the capitalist left was a horrific period. It was period in which the U.S. was very much a totalitarian police state.

In the 1950s, homosexuality was a crime that resulted in imprisonment or forced psychological treatment and hospitalization. Feminists and non-conforming women were also subject to forced hospitalization and torture with “electrical shock therapy.”

In addition, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had a huge public relations campaign bearing the slogan “The FBI is as close to you as your telephone.” People were encouraged to call the FBI if they saw people taking petitions for leftist causes, or criticizing U.S. foreign or domestic policy.

Employers required their employees to sign “loyalty oaths” stating that their political opinions were suitable to the boss.

Religion was forced on the public through mandatory prayer in public schools, and the adding of “Under God” to the pledge of allegiance.

In the Southern U.S. Blacks were barred from voting, and those who rallied to change this were labeled “subversive” and often arrested. The Ku Klux Klan had free reign, and its terrorist activities against Jews, African-Americans, and other oppressed people were openly supported. Emmit Till, a 14 year old Black youth was tortured to death for whistling at a white woman. His killers were acquitted in court, and later bragged about it in a national newspaper.

Catholic Schools mobilized youth to attack protesters in the New York City, providing them with placards reading “Kill A Commie For Christ" and permission to use violence.

The government created a network of concentration camps, and had a list of 2 million people who would be placed in them if a “state of national emergency” was declared by congress, under the McCarran Internal Security Act.

Each police department had a wing called the “Red Squad” or the “Anti-Subversive Squad” which openly stated its goal as the suppression of certain political ideologies and beliefs.

Women frequently died from illegal, thus unregulated, abortions.

It was a crime to own a condom in many states, and likewise, in many states receiving a pornographic magazine through the mail was a felony, punishable with jail time.

A military draft was in effect, and countless young men who did not attend college were conscripted into the military against their will.

Teachers beat students in public schools frequently, without question.

Battered women’s shelters and prosecution for domestic violence were both unheard of.

This is all undisputed historical fact about the post-war United States, much of it not even being changed until the mid-1970s.

Why, I must ask, is the 1950s portrayed in the public consciousness “the wonder years?” There is hardly any "wonder" in the accurate portrait painted above of the 1950s United States.

A Bribe for "Labor Aristocrats, Gone!"

The myth of the 1950s as being a joyous episode of “Leave It To Beaver” is a deceptive, ugly myth.

The only thing about the 1950s that makes it seem better than now is that there was economic prosperity. For certain sectors of the working class there were unlimited job opportunities at union wages. A “family owned home”, something only available to the upper class before, became a staple of many white workers life in the U.S. A “family car” was common as well.

A family could survive on a single income from a “bread-winner.”

It was because of these bribes granted to so many white workers, that the harsh political suppression heaped on the population at large was allowed to continue, without the massive resistance that eventually erupted in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

In the post-war period, the U.S. was the only industrial country that had not been reduced to rubble. U.S. capitalists were now the undisputed “top dogs” of world capitalism, and in order to make sure no strikes, protests, and worker’s uprisings took place on the “home front” they handed out a lot of goodies in exchange for class peace.

Lenin referred to this concept as the formation of a “labor aristocracy.” A section of the working class was given so much prosperity by its ruling class that it shed class consciousness, and began to be “bourgeosified”, thinking in line with the ruling class and identifying with its interests.

The 1950s was the “honey-moon period” for workers, granted by their capitalist oppressors, following the great depression.

During the 1930s and early 40s, the Communist Party, the Socialist Workers Party, the trade unions, the Civil Rights Congress, and countless other leftist and progressive movements sprung up. A whole culture devoted to fighting for a new socialist future existed.

The 1950s was the period in which this was killed with bribes and jackboots; both carrots and sticks at the same time, so to speak.

The prosperity enjoyed by workers in the U.S., of course, did not apply to Black workers, or Latin@ workers. The Jim Crow south left millions of Black workers without indoor plumbing or reasonable employment, in addition the apartheid conditions.

Indigenous and Latin@ workers in the western U.S. and elsewhere were also brutalized and abused, as well, sharing the position of “last hired, first fired” with other oppressed nations.

However, since the 1950s, this “labor aristocracy” is rapidly vanishing. Unions have been virtually destroyed, and wages have declined beyond belief. As Fred Goldstein documents in his groundbreaking book Low-Wage Capitalism, the lifestyle of all U.S. workers has declined dramatically since then.

The “Family Owned Home” has been foreclosed by banks. The factory jobs paid less and less, until they were shipped off to another country. The college education so many thought was their hope for social mobility now costs something like $100,000, and will leave those who get it with massive debt, and much less economic advantage along with it.

We Must Fight Back!

The answer for U.S. workers is not to long for the years of a totalitarian state during economic boom like the 1950s. The answer is to form our own organizations, and struggle and fightback. The answer is not to look at the past, but at the future.

The Workers at Woodlawn Cemetery in New York City are the example to follow. When faced with the threat of layoffs, they have announced that they will fight back. They broke with the company union and as a “band of brothers” joined the Teamsters. They have openly told the bosses that they will not accept their terms or be intimidated by their threats of layoffs.

Leave Beaver in the Dust Bin of History. The “Leave it to Beaver” world is a lying fantasy, and it is also long gone. Rather, let us workers embrace heritage of William Z. Foster, Harry Bridges, A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King Jr., and all others who fought back for justice and freedom.

As poverty and misery grow in the U.S., it pretends to be heaven. If this is so, let us be like the heroic workers of Paris Commune, and storm heaven itself, claiming the riches and gold for the we who built it with our blood and sweat.

Capitalism offers no way forward. Only we can carve out a better future.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Open Letter to WW Readers from Leslie Feinberg


The following letter was written on Jan. 6.

The reason readers haven’t seen my byline in Workers World newspaper for several years is that I am ill and disabled from late-stage, long-untreated tick-borne infectious diseases.

Since I began working on the newspaper in 1974, I wrote, proofread, edited and did other labor on Workers World during more than 30-plus years of undiagnosed cyclical illnesses and disabilities. However, I became acutely ill and disabled in October 2007, and I have been unable to recover my health.

I am proud to remain on the masthead of Workers World newspaper as a Managing Editor; however I must add this fact: I am on protracted medical leave.

I regret that I am so seriously ill now, and so disabled as a result, that I am no longer able to answer online inquiries to the newspaper about previous articles.

A partial bibliography of articles that I wrote in Workers World from 1974 to 2002 was compiled by M. R. Cook, a working-class undergraduate student. Cook’s enormous contribution of bibliographic labor can be found at transgenderwarrior.org/references.html

Bylined articles I wrote between 2002 and 2007 are accessible through keyword search at workers.org.

As I began to understand how ill I was becoming, I tried to reference information from my library and online research in the series “Lavender & Red.” (workers.org)

The books I used are referenced in the series, and other facts can be found via online web research with keyword phrases.

I regret not having been able to endnote and develop a bibliography for more of the entire Lavender & Red series. As I was becoming increasingly ill, however, I was able — with a lot of comradely help — to apply book-standard referencing to about a quarter of the L&R series — the articles compiled into the book entitled “Rainbow Solidarity in Defense of Cuba.” (leftbooks.com)

I believe the following four articles, which I wrote for Workers World, best flesh out the overall concluding political trajectory of the Lavender & Red series:

“What’s behind anti-gay pogrom in Russia?” (June 2, 2006) www.workers.org/2006/world/russia-0608/

“LGBT liberation: An essential working-class struggle” (June 24, 2006) www.workers.org/2006/us/lfeinberg-0629/

“Struggle over Middle East reaches into world LGBT movements” (July 27, 2006) www.workers.org/2006/world/mideast-lgbt-0803/

“Death of trans immigrant in detention forges united protests” (Sept. 8, 2007) www.workers.org/2007/us/trans-0913/

All my writing has been strengthened by the labor of others, as I have contributed my labor to the writing of others. The strengths of my written work — as part of my adult lifetime of political activism — are based on collective labor and the lessons of collective struggle. The weaknesses and errors are my own as an individual.

Today, it is very painful, slow and difficult for me to read and write — and even to speak. But when I read, I make sure to read Workers World newspaper.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Michigan Protest Beats Back Anti-Gay Bigots!


Report and photo by Alan Pollock

Hateful bigots from Fred Phelps’ Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kan., were met by protests on Nov. 18 when they visited several Michigan cities. The group is rabidly anti-gay/lesbian/bi/trans/queer and infamous wherever they travel throughout the U.S. with their message of hate. They often target the funerals of rank-and-file U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq or Afghanistan, blaming their deaths on LGBTQ people.

In Detroit about 50 counterprotesters gathered near Wayne State University. At a high school in East Lansing, Mich., some 600 overwhelmed the handful of bigots 100 to 1. The counterprotesters divided into two camps. While 450 held a church-sponsored picket several blocks away, a counterinsurgency of 150 strong rushed the WBC front line and overwhelmed the Phelps group with louder voices and strength in numbers.

The bigots were visibly shaken by the militant crowd. A threatened protest by the WBC at a GI’s funeral later that day in Marine City, Mich., did not materialize.
Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news

Monday, October 18, 2010

Anti-LGBT Business Held Accountable



Click Here For More Video Coverage

Bullying, Bigotry, and the Struggle

Published Oct 14, 2010 8:54 AM

The recent spate of suicides by young people who are lesbian, gay, bi or trans or perceived as such by their peers is heartbreaking. It is also a call to action.

We stand with all those stepping forward in solidarity with LGBT youth against the bashers, the bullies. We add our voices to the chorus telling our beautiful, precious children and teens: “Hang in there. It will get better.” But we say something else, too. Our message to the youth, LGBT and straight allies alike, is: Join us in the struggle.

It is the struggle that will overturn LGBT oppression. It is the struggle that will do away with ignorance and homophobia. It is the struggle, the mass movement for LGBT liberation over the last 50-plus years, that has already raised consciousness tremendously — that’s why there is such an outcry, such an outpouring of support in response to the recent attacks and the suicides. Most people now support full rights for the LGBT community. With more struggle, more will be won over.

Furthermore — and here we want to step out of our editorial box and speak directly to any individual youth whom this message may reach, any young person whose daily school or home life is made miserable by taunting, teasing, physical assault, isolation — if you join the struggle, your own life will improve.

For the struggle is liberating. It strengthens you. It shows you that you’re not alone. It provides you with friends and comrades. Through the struggle you find your skills, your power, your righteous rage, and, most important, your voice. You are no longer silenced.

What do we mean by the struggle? We mean uniting with others fighting for the same goals — taking action, militant action, demanding what is right. It’s what the Civil Rights Movement did in the 1950s and 60s, when courageous people marched, sat in, did everything they could to overturn the racist Jim Crow laws. It’s what unions do when workers strike to defend their wages and benefits.

It’s what the LGBT movement has done for many years. For example, Oct. 11 was National Coming Out Day. This day commemorates the great March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights and Action on AIDS that took place on Oct. 11, 1987. Half a million people demonstrated demanding equal rights.

Thanks to actions like that, much has been won. In some states, same-sex couples can marry. In some states, anti-LGBT discrimination is illegal. The federal government, however, does not recognize same-sex marriage. There is no federal bar to discrimination based on sexual identity or gender expression. So there’s still much to do. It will take a great resurgence of national struggle, united with the movements against racism, for women’s rights, for union power, because unity is key to winning concrete victories for all — but it can be done.

For every bully, for every homophobe who calls you names and tries to make you feel hopeless and small, there are millions who support you, wish you well, are fighting back against the bashers and bigots. There’s a place for you here with us, striding side by side with sisters and brothers who’ve got your back. This is the power of the struggle. It’ll save your life.

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Gay Senior Wins Legal Battle

Published Sep 2, 2010 9:32 PM

The Sonoma (Calif.) County Board of Supervisors finally surrendered on Aug. 5. The board agreed to settle with Clay Greene, and he was awarded $650,000. Clay Greene and his partner Harold Scull had been forcibly abducted by the county in April 2008. Their possessions had been auctioned off after the city terminated the lease on their home.

Greene and Scull established legal rights for themselves as a couple despite bans on lesbian and gay marriage and other efforts to prevent legal recognition of same-sex unions. The couple had been together for 25 years and granted each other power of attorney in emergency situations.

When Scull fell ill in April 2008 and was taken to the hospital, Greene was denied the right to visit his partner, despite having legal power of attorney. When Greene attempted to gain his legally established rights, he was forced into a nursing home. Greene’s claims of unjust hospitalization were labeled “dementia,” and negative stereotypes about the elderly were used to remove his credibility and keep him locked away.

The couple were held against their will in separate hospitals. Scull died four months later, leaving Greene locked away and not even informed of his longtime partner’s death. Greene had tried to leave the nursing home where he was held, but was continually recaptured. (Bay Area Reporter Online)

In the meantime, the county confiscated and sold all the personal items inside the home that Greene and Scull had amassed together. Their collection of valuable artwork, furniture and even their two cats were auctioned off, with the proceeds going to Sonoma County. Finally, with the help of a lawyer, Greene was released from the nursing home after being held against his will for two months.

The National Center for Lesbian Rights provided Greene with three attorneys to represent him in his struggle for compensation. One of them, Gregory Spaulding, described the process of winning justice as “very expensive.”

Fifty witnesses sent affidavits to the court and were prepared to testify on Greene’s behalf. In addition, seven expert witnesses were paid to give their input on the case and testify at trial if need be.

Claims of domestic abuse that the county used to justify the abduction were admitted to be “unfounded” by officials.

Anne Dennis, Greene’s lead attorney, commented on how Greene had become “fragile” since the death of his partner. Now that a settlement has been reached, Greene will be able to enjoy what the legal director of the NCLR, Sharon Minter, described as “the secure environment he deserves.”

The struggle to obtain justice for Greene was galvanized around the U.S. by publicity garnered on Facebook, where over 19,000 people signed on for “Justice for Clay Greene and Harold of Sonoma County, CA.”

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Old Lesbian Group Fights Racism, Ageism

By Sharon Danann
Cleveland
Published Aug 29, 2010 10:27 PM

Racism and ageism were themes for the keynote speakers at the Old Lesbians Organizing for Change national gathering here in July, and for the speakout sessions done in a format known as “fishbowls.” The 150 participants ranged in age from 59 to 87.

Women attended from all corners of the U.S., and there was a strong delegation from Australia. Workshops had participants develop organizing strategies for the top-priority issues. Ongoing discussions of racism will continue in several regions of the U.S.

Two significant resolutions were passed (see related article). One stated OLOC’s solidarity with immigrant communities facing the “devastating effects” of Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 and pledged to boycott Arizona and other states with similar laws in scheduling organizational events. The second memorialized 11 Black women murdered on Imperial Avenue in Cleveland and called for stepped-up efforts to stop the epidemic of violence against women and girls in the U.S. and worldwide.

Among the many participants who shared their talents in the evening entertainments was Alix Dobkin, an OLOC board member. Dobkin read from “My Red Blood,” her memoir of growing up communist and coming out during the women’s liberation movement.

Most of the participants had been activists for many decades and were builders of services such as rape crisis centers and domestic violence shelters. One of the resolutions makes it clear that “we will be quick to defend these vital institutions against onslaughts waged in the name of the economic crisis.”Racism and ageism were themes for the keynote speakers at the Old Lesbians Organizing for Change national gathering here in July, and for the speakout sessions done in a format known as “fishbowls.” The 150 participants ranged in age from 59 to 87.

Women attended from all corners of the U.S., and there was a strong delegation from Australia. Workshops had participants develop organizing strategies for the top-priority issues. Ongoing discussions of racism will continue in several regions of the U.S.

Two significant resolutions were passed (see related article). One stated OLOC’s solidarity with immigrant communities facing the “devastating effects” of Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 and pledged to boycott Arizona and other states with similar laws in scheduling organizational events. The second memorialized 11 Black women murdered on Imperial Avenue in Cleveland and called for stepped-up efforts to stop the epidemic of violence against women and girls in the U.S. and worldwide.

Among the many participants who shared their talents in the evening entertainments was Alix Dobkin, an OLOC board member. Dobkin read from “My Red Blood,” her memoir of growing up communist and coming out during the women’s liberation movement.

Most of the participants had been activists for many decades and were builders of services such as rape crisis centers and domestic violence shelters. One of the resolutions makes it clear that “we will be quick to defend these vital institutions against onslaughts waged in the name of the economic crisis.”

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

U.S. manipulates women’s condition to build war support

By Joyce Chediac
Published Aug 13, 2010 10:11 AM

It is shocking and disturbing. Time magazine’s cover has a picture of a young Afghan woman whose nose has been cut off. The headline reads, “What happens if we leave Afghanistan.” (Aug. 9)

Time’s story claims the Taliban ordered 18-year-old Aisha’s nose and ears cut off because she left her husband and fled abusive in-laws. She is now living in a Kabul women’s shelter run by an American nongovernmental organization, and will come to the U.S. for reconstructive surgery

Surely, this cruel and abusive treatment of women must not be permitted anywhere. Time’s implication, however, that the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is the only barrier preventing further horrendous treatment of Afghan women is a lie. The article is manipulating the feelings of well-meaning people, while exploiting Aisha’s plight, in order to further Washington’s genocidal war, which has hurt Afghan women the most.

Time’s goal? Answering WikiLeaks

The recent WikiLeaks publications showed “How coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents. ... How a secret ‘black’ unit of special forces [death squads] hunts down Taliban leaders for ‘kill or capture’ without trial. ... How the coalition is increasingly using deadly Reaper drones to hunt and kill Taliban targets by remote control from a base in Nevada,” and how there has been a steep rise in Taliban bomb attacks on NATO troops. (The Guardian, July 25)

A separate editorial in the Aug. 9 issue of Time entitled “What’s hard to look at” admits that its cover picture and story are meant to counter the WikiLeaks publication. The magazine pitches its cover story as “emotional truth” and “something you cannot find in those 91,000 documents” of the leaked information.

Priyamvada Gopal, professor of English at Cambridge University who specializes in women and postcolonial theory, more accurately described the strategy behind what Time is doing. The WikiLeaks documents, she writes, “reveal CIA advice to use the plight of Afghan women as ‘pressure points,’ an emotive way to rally flagging public support for the war.” (The Guardian, Aug. 3)

Time has dropped all semblance of objective reporting. The magazine has taken the CIA’s “advice” and exploited Aisha’s plight to build war support. Truthfully, the more than 30 years of war in Afghanistan that Washington fueled and abetted has locked many rural Afghan women into the worst of both worlds: a medieval social structure and the destruction and dislocation of imperialist war.

Afghan women’s advocate Suraya Pakzad recently described the desperate situation for women in her country and its cause. “Three decades of war, displacement, warlordism, gun trafficking and narcotics trafficking,” she said, “come together and create a really hard situation for women. When there’s no security and continuation of war, there’s no guarantee for women’s rights.” (Politics Daily, March 10)

CIA’s war erased women’s gains


The U.S. press gets nostalgic about the freedom women in Kabul enjoyed before the Taliban. They fail to mention that the only government that brought significant gains to Afghan women took power in 1978 and sought to build socialism in Afghanistan.

Working under difficult conditions in one of the poorest countries in the world, the women and men in this government achieved the following: Feudal laws restricting women were abolished, and women became professors, attorneys, judges and government ministers. Seventy percent of the teachers, 50 percent of the government workers and 40 percent of the doctors were women. This government also sought ways to reach out to rural Afghanistan to develop it socially and economically.

Washington opposed this government from day one and courted the same rural feudal elements who found women’s new authority unacceptable. For its own ends, the U.S. exploited these feudalists’ misogyny as much as their anti-communism. The rural rulers who saw women as property would have been swept into the dustbin of history had U.S. imperialism not given them a new life and more than $3 billion in weapons.

The warlords overthrew that progressive government in 1992, after 13 years of vicious war financed by the U.S. and organized by the CIA. Soviet intervention to aid the progressive government was also thwarted. Even the New York Times admits, “The mujahedeen leaders who forced out the Soviets in the late 1980s were as conservative as the Taliban in many places, keeping women at home in order to preserve family honor instead of educating them or integrating them into the government.” (July 30)

U.S. empowered anti-women groups

The U.S. government was not promoting Afghan women’s rights when it installed the Northern Alliance, which ruled Afghanistan from 1992 to 1996. This clique was seen as “a symbol of massacre, systematic rape and pillage.”(The Independent, Nov. 14, 2001).

The Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 1996, but the U.S. raised no objections for five years. When the Bush administration invaded the country in 2001 and defeated the Taliban, it installed in its place the misogynist Northern Alliance. The current Kabul government still contains many members of this group, which are as reactionary on women’s rights as the Taliban.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government has played it both ways. Beginning in 1979, Washington used the gains made by women under the progressive Afghan government to provoke reactionary forces into action against that government. Today, for U.S. domestic consumption, Washington claims it is “rescuing” Afghan women from the very same reactionary forces it armed and empowered.

An imperialist occupying army can never improve women’s conditions in a country it occupies. The best thing for the women of Afghanistan is for the U.S. to leave completely and unconditionally and cease all covert and overt interference in this tortured nation. Only then will Afghan women and men have the chance to build a safe and stable environment where they can make their needs known and have them met.
Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Gay Pride in West Virginia


West Virginia Pride held its 14th annual LGBTQ Pride Parade/Festival in the capital city of Charleston on June 6. The crowd of several thousand people attending was multigenerational and multinational, with significant transgender representation.

A parade kicked off the event, featuring contingents from W.Va. Pride, the ACLU, Parents, Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), Mountain State Bears and the Covenant House. Following the parade, people enjoyed live music and entertainment from mostly transgender performers.

— Report and photo by Jeremy Radabaugh

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.